TOM DURRIE, BA, MA, MMus
307—1683 Adanac Street
Vancouver, BC  V5L 2C7
[email protected]

604-215-0019

August 23, 2010

An open letter to the Assembly of British Columbia Arts Councils

Ms. Joan Richoz, President,
Assembly of BC Arts Councils

PO Box 92 Station A
Nanaimo, BC V9R 5K4
[email protected]

Dear Ms. Richoz:

I am writing to urge you to decline the participation of the Assembly of BC Arts Councils in the dispersing of BC Spirit Festivals funding.

We have recently heard Ms. Jane Danzo, former chair of the British Columbia Arts Council, decry government involvement in arts funding and the erosion of arms-length arts policies and decision-making. “Arms-length,” as I understand it, means that government allocates a budgetary amount for the arts, and that money is administered by an independent body, in our case the British Columbia Arts Council, using peer-assessment juries. Responsible and progressive arts councils will often fund artists whose activities are not necessarily popular or supportive of government policies. If we look at the history of art, it is clear that there are sound reasons for this. Our current government seems to be shying away from subjecting itself to the possibility of a lively, invigorating, and challenging arts scene. Freedom of expression is the essence of art. Would you want to support officially determined limits to this freedom?

In my opinion, the BC Spirit Festivals program is a blatant political project designed to make artists and arts groups throughout British Columbia promote and support the government’s agenda. In other words, the government is offering funding to arts groups that will, as Minister Kreuger put it, “… bring(s) together artists, cultural organizations and all British Columbians to celebrate the spirit of B.C. in our communities.” While “celebrate the spirit of B.C. in our communities” is open to interpretation, one immediately suspects a very strict limit on what artists are permitted to do. To make this even more clear, the application guidelines specify: “A limited number of grants are available to assist community, regional and Aboriginal arts organizations with programs that support the vision of the 2010 Sports and Arts Legacy and the BC Spirit Festivals. ” [emphasis added] Peer juries, in determining awards, will, of course, have to abide by the guidelines.

In light of the fact that artists and arts organizations throughout the province are reeling from severe cuts to their funding, it seems ironic—I’m tempted to say offensive—that the Ministry would now come up with an idea of a celebratory festival. What is there to celebrate?

With this in mind, I urge you to take a strong but polite stance and simply say “No thank you, Mr. Kreuger.”

Sincerely yours,

(signed)

Tom Durrie
Charter member, BC Arts Council (1996-99)

cc:
The Georgia Straight
The Vancouver Sun
The Tyee
CBC
Vancouver Alliance for Arts and Culture
Arts Advocacy BC

Hearing Dr. Stanley Hamilton (BC Arts Council Interim Chair) on the Early Edition this morning, who could possibly be surprised by his position. Surely, the Ministry was not likely to appoint someone who would support Jane Danzo’s stance on government interference with Arts Council policies.

Just a couple of quotes:
Jane Danzo: “The board of Council has no independent voice from government.”

Stanley Hamilton (re the Legacy and Spirit Festival funds): “We have to wait to see what the Minister and his team have decided is [sic] going to be the ground rules.”

And: “{BC Arts Council} staff will work with the Ministry to determine programs.”

Doesn’t sound very arms-length to me.

When asked if Spirit Festival projects would have to meet with government approval, Dr. Hamilton replied: “You will be subjected to a peer review process, not a political process.” He failed to mention, however, that every grant application must meet certain guidelines as set out by the Arts Council. Don’t try to kid me into believing that the guidelines will not be overseen by the Ministry.

‘Nuff said.

© 2010 Arts Advocacy BC