AABC Board member David Stewart has sent us this submission to the Budget Committee. The deadline for submissions is October 18. You can add your voice by sending us your submission.

 

October 4, 2012
Submission to Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services

 I am writing on behalf of the British Columbia Choral Federation whose 200 member choirs represent some 6000 choral musicians, both amateur and professional.   We were pleased that the British Columbia Government is again providing $16,831,000 to the BC Arts Council (BCAC) to support arts and culture in communities throughout the province during the 2012-13 fiscal year.

The BCAC grant to our organization totals $11,100 for the 2012-2013 fiscal year and we are assured of the same grant in 2013-2014. In addition we received $32,700 from gaming revenues.  Added together these grants account for just under 20 per cent of our annual budget of $238,000. The balance of our revenues come from membership dues, an annual raffle, generous donations from many of our board members, workshop fees, and our  flagship event, CHORFEST,  which is held in a different  BC community every year.  So it must be said that we are pulling our weight in terms of keeping the Federation on a firm financial foundation.

However, I note with some dismay that British Columbia still holds 13th place among the provinces and territories in terms of per capita spending on Arts and Culture.  Our province has held this questionable position for the better part of the last decade and I have not seen any effort on the part of the Provincial Government to do anything about it.  British Columbia would have to double its per capita spending on arts and culture to come anywhere near the national average of $98 per person.

The arts are the foundation of a civil society.  Furthermore it is arts and culture that determine the success of a society.  “Those communities that are richest in their artistic tradition are also those that are the most progressive in their economic performance and most resilient and secure in their economic structure.” (Economist John Kenneth Galbraith.)

According to Statistics Canada, in 2003-4 (the last year for which comprehensive arts statistics have been published), with an investment of $7.7 billion from three levels of government, the arts and culture sector directly employed 600,000 people and generated $40 billion for the Canadian economy.  That’s a return on investment of more than 500%. Approximately 25% of this gain goes directly back to tax revenue—which is more than the initial investment.

Conversely:  If imbalance is allowed to disturb harmony in the relationship between the economic, social, and cultural dimensions of a society, that society will find itself degraded and will rapidly become unjust. (Creating a Policy for Arts and Culture in British Columbia – A Draft Proposal  by Arts Advocacy BC)

Art occupies in society the equivalent of one of those glands the size of a pea on which the proper functioning of the body depends, and whose removal is as easy as it is fatal. (Cyril Connolly, The Condemned Playground)

Our  recommendations to the 2012 Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services are as follows.

1.      Continue to generously support arts and Cultural organizations, including heritage and community-based organizations, with  arms-length public investment through the BC Arts Council; funding that is stable and sufficient to support the Council’s strategic plan.

 2.      Plan to double British Columbia’s per capita funding for arts and culture over the next two years to bring it up to at least the national average.

 3.      Provide support for training programs to develop the entrepreneurial and business skills in the arts and culture sector.

We strongly believe that arts and culture have a crucial part to play in the economic, social, environmental, health, and educational future of a British Columbia to ensure that it is, indeed, among the best places on earth.

David K. Stewart
President,  British Columbia Choral Federation

 

The central conservative truth is that culture, not politics, determines the success of a society.

The central liberal truth is that politics can change a culture and save it from itself.–Daniel Patrick Moynihan

 

These are important words to remember as you make your submission–in person, on line, by mail–to Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services. This is all happening RIGHT NOW, so don’t delay. Let them know that you want the funding to the arts to increase. AABC is asking that funding to the BC Arts Council be doubled during the next two years. We also want to emphasize the importance of cultural tourism, a great opportunty that government has not been supporting.

 

Don’t forget our DRAFT CULTURAL POLICY FOR BC. Ask that they consider this and include it in their report.

 

Make arts and election issue!

 

 

 

 

 

September 9, 2012

Sent by e-mail to bill.bennett.mla@leg.bc.ca

Hon. Bill Bennett, Minister of Community, Sport and Cultural Development
East Annex
Parliament Buildings
Victoria, BC
V8V 1X4

Dear Minister:

Please accept our congratulations on your appointment as Minister of Community, Sport and Cultural Development. As advocates for arts and culture and artists in British Columbia, we are very interested in your opinions on funding for the arts and how that is administered. We would greatly appreciate your assistance in revealing the disposition of some $3.2 million (part of the Sport and Arts Legacy Fund) that was used by Minister Chong as a “discretionary” fund for supporting organizations of the ministry’s choosing. To date, we have not seen a complete accounting of how this money was distributed. You can find other information, correspondence, etc. on our website www.artsadvocacybc.ca.

We maintain that all funding for arts and culture should be managed and distributed through the British Columbia Arts Council.

As you know, the government of British Columbia has not adopted a cultural policy setting out guiding principles and positions on how government relates to arts and culture. You can find our draft cultural policy, plus additional comments here: http://www.artsadvocacybc.ca/a-cultural-policy-for-bc/

We also believe that cultural tourism is an important and substantial untapped resource in the province. Many studies have been done on cultural tourism, and many countries around the world are mining this resource, not only to the advantage of the usual tourist industries like hotels and restaurants but also to the increased benefits to artists of all disciplines. To be successful a vital cultural tourism industry would require substantial and stable funding for artists, arts organizations, and infrastructure throughout the province. This investment could reap substantial returns.

We look forward to hearing your thoughts on these matters, and we hope to engage in an ongoing dialogue.

Sincerely yours,

 

(signed)

Tom Durrie, executive director
Arts Advocacy British Columbia

 

 

Led by various Vancouver arts organizations, Vancouver Not Vegas sparked the action to encourage Council to turn down Pavco’s bid to build a giant casino at BC Place. At the time Edgewater claimed that they would not continue at Plaza of Nations if they couldn’t expand. Is now the time to encourage Pavco to create a cultural facility on the BC Place site. Stay tuned.

Here’s some history from 1012 and here is the latest development:

From the Georgia Straight

Edgewater Casino reconsidering its Plaza of Nations lease

The CMP proposal for the Plaza of Nations involves 1.4 million square feet of residential space, 350,000 square feet for commercial use, and a community centre with 69 child-care spaces.

Thom Quine
By Carlito Pablo, July 25, 2012

The Edgewater Casino may continue taking bets at Vancouver’s Plaza of Nations beyond 2013.

Las Vegas–based operator Paragon Gaming is negotiating with property owner Canadian Metropolitan Properties for a lease extension.

“We are in contact with CMP,” Paragon spokesperson Tamara Hicks told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview. This comes despite the fact that Paragon previously indicated it might close Edgewater if a proposal to relocate the casino to a site near B.C. Place was rejected by city council.

In a letter dated March 14, 2011, Paragon representative John Cahill told council that the casino’s future at the Plaza of Nations “beyond February, 2013 is uncertain”.

On April 19, 2011, council approved an application by the provincially owned B.C. Pavilion Corporation to rezone 777 Pacific Boulevard, adjacent to B.C. Place, for a mixed-use entertainment complex. That was to include two hotels and a casino.

The site, which is yet to be built, was intended to serve as the new home of Edgewater. However, council rejected the proposed expansion of the casino to 150 gaming tables and 1,500 slot machines. It currently has 65 tables and 493 slots.

CMP senior vice president Daisen Gee-Wing confirmed that talks are taking place between his company and Paragon. “They [Paragon] said they weren’t going to renew, but they’ve asked for one and we’re negotiating with them,” Gee-Wing told the Straight in a phone interview.

Although Edgewater may be able to stay at the Plaza of Nations a little longer, it will have to find another home in the next few years.

Last month, James K. M. Cheng Architects Inc. applied to the City of Vancouver on behalf of CMP for rezoning of the four-hectare-plus Plaza of Nations at 750 Pacific Boulevard. CMP wants to create a mixed-use development on the waterfront property that would include condo towers of up to 30 storeys. It plans to build a total of 2,000 residential units.

According to Gee-Wing, the development will provide plenty of public space, including a community centre. The company would also put in a hockey arena to be shared by the public and the Vancouver Canucks, who would use it for practices.

Unlike a number of large-scale rezoning applications that local neighbourhoods have opposed, the CMP application enjoys the support of the False Creek Residents Association. The group also backed a proposal by Aquilini Development and Construction to build three market-rental towers of 32, 28, and 24 storeys around Rogers Arena. Council approved the project on July 19.

FCRA cochair Patsy McMillan explained that her group has had numerous discussions with CMP and Aquilini about local amenities that would accompany their developments.

“Those are things that are really important to the community,” McMillan told the Straight in a phone interview. “We know that there is density coming.” She recalled that in October 2009, council endorsed the further development of Northeast False Creek. This included providing 1.8 million square feet of job space and four million square feet of residential floor space.

The CMP proposal for the Plaza of Nations involves 1.4 million square feet of residential space, 350,000 square feet for commercial use, and a community centre with 69 child-care spaces.

Although council approved a new casino location at B.C. Place, False Creek resident Sean Bickerton doubts that Paragon will be able to move there.

Bickerton, a former candidate for Vancouver city council, said the company may not have the funds to go ahead. He was referring to media reports in April of this year that the River Cree Resort and Casino in Alberta, which Paragon co-owns, could face bankruptcy after defaulting on a $111-million debt.

“I don’t think the company is solid enough financially to do the deal unless the [B.C.] Lottery Corporation gives them the money,” Bickerton told the Straight by phone.

Paragon’s Hicks countered that Bickerton has been “misinformed”.

But she also revealed that Paragon is looking at “various opportunities throughout Metro Vancouver”, and not just the B.C. Place site, saying: “Once we’re ready to announce that, we will let you know.”

Tagged with:  

VANCOUVER NOW HAS AN ARTS AND CULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE

According to an article in the Vancouver Sun (May 24)  by Manori Ravindran, the new advisory committee “gives artists a voice at city hall.”

AABC says, “We’ll see.”

The Arts and Culture Advisory Committee, approved by Council on February 28th, is Vision Vancouver’s version of their 2007 promise to create a Vancouver Arts Council, which would be an arms-length decision-making body similar to the BC Arts Council. This could have meant the elimination of several high-paying jobs in the city’s Cultural Services Department. Many arts councils, e.g. Toronto Arts Council, also perform a strong advocacy role. The new committee, in its advisory role, obviously has no decision-making power.

You can read the 11-page staff report (Cultural Services staff) here: Establishment of an Arts and Culture Advisory Committee

Here are the members of the committee, appointed from 199 applicants:

Mary-Louise Albert, artistic managing director of the Chutzpah! Festival, former dancer
Graeme Berglund, founder of The Cheaper Show, artist, editor, member of Lifetime Collective
Thomas Cannell, Coast Salish artist
Becky Chan, artist
Hugh Cochlin, principal of Proscenium Architecture
Chan Hon Goh, artistic director of the Goh Ballet
Amy Kazymerchyk, film programmer Pacific Cinémathéque, photographer
Sharman King, founder of Book Warehouse, musician
Paddy MacLeod, co-founder and general manager of Blackbird Theatre Company
Katherine McManus, writing and communications director for SFU continuing studies
Nigel Prince, executive director Contemporary Art Gallery
Esther Rausenberg, artist, photographer
Eric Szeto, journalist
Charlie Wu, managing director of TaiwanFest
Marcus Youssef, artistic director of the Neworld Theatre

They will meet six times a year.

We look  forward to hearing the results of their deliberations.

NOTICE TO AABC MEMBERS:
In order to receive our newsletters, please be sure that our e-mail address: aabc@artsadvocacybc.ca is in your address book.
If you are not already a member, please join now. It’s free!

 

 

Maybe the blame lies on us. The follow article was sent to us by AABC board member Connie More.
We invite your thoughts.

 

Entire performing arts industry is to blame for the demise of the Vancouver Playhouse

March 17, 2012 00:03:00
Matthew Jocelyn

The Vancouver Playhouse announced on March 9 that, crippled by chronic deficit-related issues, it was closing its doors the very next day, a few months shy of its 50th anniversary. This was and is a day of mourning for Canadian theatre.

More significantly, it is a sign of the collective failure of all of us directly or indirectly involved in the performing arts industry in Canada, a failure to defend the indisputable need for strong, publicly funded theatrical institutions in our country.

Created in 1962, the Vancouver Playhouse Theatre Company was a forerunner of the boom of large regional theatre companies established countrywide throughout the 1960s, supported largely, at their inception, by the Canada Council for the Arts. Yet despite this generous support to create a network of centres for the performing arts, the intrinsic, lasting value of being an institution was never truly conferred upon them.

As with many such organizations, the Vancouver Playhouse remained a “company,” a rootless entity forced to rent its city-owned performance space and justify its existence through commercial success. The term “company,” though used widely in the theatre business, unwittingly and perversely infers a likeness to the private sector. Companies come and go, are bought and sold and in the end must turn a profit or die. Institutions, on the other hand, are part of the fabric of society, they give meaning while at the same time being engines for change, and for that reason are essential to preserve.

Which public school, which hospital, museum or university, which prison or military base, research centre or art gallery goes by the term “company” or is treated as one? Why then our country’s not-for-profit performing arts institutions, a fundamental part of our national identity, the home for the creation and transmission of our stories?

The bankruptcy of the Vancouver Playhouse is not a local problem — it is the failure of an entire system. It is a failure of the department of Canadian Heritage which, by allowing this disappearance, is depriving not only Vancouver but also the rest of Canada of a fundamental part of our national heritage. It is a failure of the Canada Council for the Arts, whose funding mechanisms are not attuned to the specific role of the country’s major performing arts institutions, forcing us to operate on an edulcorated commercial model as opposed to enabling us to fulfill the mandate of true creative licence and engaged public service that should be ours.

It is a failure of the province of British Columbia and the city of Vancouver. And it is a failure of the Playhouse’s board of directors, unwilling or unable to fulfill their charge as its guardians, or to actively rally support for its preservation.

It is also a failure of the performing arts institutional network of which I am a part, the large-scale not-for-profit theatres, each caught up in our own survival to such a degree that we have been unable to create a collective national voice. It is a failure of the Professional Association of Canadian Theatres (PACT), an organization representing all professional theatre in the country, yet incapable of defending a major institution at a critical moment for fear of internal criticism from a membership dominated by smaller independent companies, most of whom also struggle to survive.

It is a failure of the two principal unions in the performing arts sector: Actors’ Equity and IATSE. Both were created as defensive mechanisms against American touring productions long before not-for-profit theatre came into existence in Canada, and both continue to confuse purely commercial theatre with theatre that has a mandate for public service, exacting often crippling conditions for our productions.

It is a failure of the media because, in general, the media are uninterested in the arts, and of theatre critics in particular, too many of whom assume that venting their (often alarmingly ill-informed) opinion is more important than “mediating” the work they are writing about, that is, helping audiences understand and appreciate its nature, its successes and failings, thus helping foster the curiosity and appetite without which theatre dies.

Sadly, it is also a failure of the artists — and here again I include myself — unable to produce a body of work that makes theatre a truly necessary, truly integrated part of our modern world, and of the audiences, insufficient in number, insufficiently curious, excessively influenced by the above-mentioned critical inadequacies.

It is, in other words, the failure of an entire system. And in this failure, each of us has lost, no one gained.

As with all true tragedies however, some form of catharsis can ensue. The disappearance of the Vancouver Playhouse can and must serve a purpose, must help us attain a deeper understanding of our profession, of the work we are (or aren’t) doing, the role we play (or don’t) within today’s world. This collective failure must be seized as an opportunity to undertake an uncompromisingly critical evaluation of how not-for-profit theatre has evolved in Canada over the past 50 years, of what we are doing (or aren’t) to ensure an artistically vital, socially integrated, institutionally rooted industry for the 50 years to come.

Simply put, it is time for an audit, a detailed medical examination of our collective corps malade. And in the wake, it is time to pursue whatever measures are required, be they surgical or otherwise. Without such fearless self-analysis, our entire industry is potentially prey to the same fatal disease as that which got the better of the Vancouver Playhouse.

As the curtain closes on the Vancouver Playhouse, I can’t help myself from asking: Who’s next?

A more insidious question follows, one for which we are all responsible: Who really cares?

Matthew Jocelyn is artistic and general director of Canadian Stage.

Home | Contact © Copyright Toronto Star 1996-2012

 

 

Form Follows Funding

In a recent article by Clay Shirky about how newspapers are going to figure out their future in terms of revenue, I thought just how much it could apply to many non-profit arts organizations.

In many ways, especially for service organizations, they face a very similar situation. In their case, their subscribers are their members.

Here is the last paragraph from the article.

“It will take time for the economic weight of those users to affect the organizational form of the paper, but slowly slowly, form follows funding. For the moment at least, the most promising experiment in user support means forgoing mass in favor of passion; this may be the year where we see how papers figure out how to reward the people most committed to their long-term survival.”

The key phrase was “form follows funding.”

This is a complex article, but well worth it. You can read it here.

As public funding dries up I think arts organizations will need to look at what their “form” is and will be forced to sink or swim on a new model. Yes, we can scream and kick, but without public funding support the form of the organizations (the way they’ve operated) that have followed the funding are going to be shaken.

In Canada, here is what the Federal Minister of Heritage James Moore said in a Vancouver Sun article: “Moore underlined the fact organizations matching government support with significant private funding will insulate themselves best from cuts and prosper most during the Conservative era.” Full story here.

My read on this? Arts funding has always been political. The pendulum has shifted and we have in Canada a Conservative Government (and in BC a conservative government even though their name is “Liberal”) that a) doesn’t like funding arts and b) wants everything to be run like a business.

The good news is, “Culture” will not die because it’s not funded by public money. They know that. It just won’t be the culture that we who work in the culture business want to hear or see.

We will continue to make the solid arguments about why funding arts is valuable both socially and economically and we’ll adapt. Some will suffer and die, others will thrive. We are very lucky to be able to even have this discussion and debate.

-

PS – we shouldn’t overlook the fact that it is the Department of Canadian Heritage. Heritage being the main word. The current Government really likes “Heritage” whereas the arts are about moving forward. Perhaps it’s no wonder they take money from progressive programs to pay for multi-million dollar War of 1812 projects.

 

Education and arts – Sir Ken Robinson

Board member, Connie More came across this wonderful video of a speech by Sir Ken Robinson. He clearly lays out what’s wrong with our education system and why the arts are so needed.

Tagged with:  

Italia bella e perduta

Here’s a message from Jon Washburn forwarded by our friends Colin Miles and Winifred Nowell. Be sure to watch the YouTube video of this remarkable and inspiring occasion.

singers, staff and board:
Here’s something for when you have a quiet moment. There is a rough (machine) translation into English after the Spanish and then a Youtube site to click on.
I suggest you have a kleenex handy.
Even in Italy and other European countries, governments are using their self-inflicted financial crises as an excuse to gut their arts and culture infrastructures. Muti’s protest is singularly compelling -  and inspiring to those of us who tire of the unending battle against the many short-sighted enemies of the arts.
Thanks to Vivienne and David, who passed it on to me.
Jon

 

Italia finalmente despertó. Les dejo saborear esto. Es conmovedor.

El último 12 de marzo, Silvio Berlusconi debió enfrentar la realidad. Italia festejaba el 150 aniversario de su unificación y en esa ocasión se dio en la ópera de Roma la ópera “Nabucco” de Giuseppe Verdi, dirigida por el maestro Ricardo Muti. Nabucco es una obra tanto musical como política: evoca el episodio de  la esclavitud de los judíos en Babilonia, y su famoso coro “Va pensiero” es el canto de los esclavos oprimidos. En Italia, este canto es el símbolo de la búsqueda de libertad del pueblo, que a fines del siglo XIX -época en que se escribió la ópera – estaba oprimido por el imperio Habsburgo, al que combatió hasta la creación de la Italia unificada.

Antes de la representación, Gianni Alemanno, alcalde de Roma, subió al escenario para pronunciar un discurso denunciando los recortes al presupuesto de cultura que hizo el gobierno, a pesar de que Alemanno es miembro del partido gobernante y viejo ministro de Berlusconi. Esta intervención política, en un momento cultural de los más simbólicos para Ialia, produciría un efecto inesperado, puesto que Berlusconi en persona asistía a la representación.

Relatado luego por el Times, Ricardo Muti, director de la orquesta, contó que fue una verdadera velada de revolución: “Al principio hubo una gran ovación en el público. Luego comenzamos con la ópera. Se desarrolló muy bien hasta que llegamos al famoso canto Va pensiero. Inmediatamente sentí que la atmósfera se tensaba en el público. Hay cosas que no se pueden describir, pero uno las siente. Era el silencio del público que se hacía sentir. Pero en el momento en que la gente se dio cuenta que empezaba el Va Pensiero, el silencio se llenó de verdadero fervor. Se podía sentir la reacción visceral del público ante el lamento de los esclavos que cantan: “Oh patria mía, tan bella y perdida.”

Cuando el coro llegaba a su fin, ya se oían en el público varios “bis”.  El público comenzó a gritar: “¡Viva Italia!”, “¡Viva Verdi!”, “¡Larga vida a Italia!”. La gente en el gallinero comenzó a arrojar papeles con mensajes patrióticos. En una única ocasión Muti había aceptado hacer un bis  para el “Va Pensiero” en la Scala de Milán en 1986, puesto que para él la ópera no debe sufrir interrupciones. “Yo no quería sólo hacer un bis. Tenía que haber una intención especial para hacerlo”, relata. Pero el público ya había despertado su sentimiento patriótico. En un gesto teatral, Muti se dio vuelta y miró al público y a Berlusconi a la vez, y dijo:

“Sí, estoy de acuerdo con esto. “Larga vida a Italia”. Pero….
Ya no tengo más 30 años y he vivido mi vida, pero recorrí mucho el mundo, y hoy tengo vergüenza de lo que sucede en mi país. Entonces accedo a vuestro pedido de un bis para el Va Pensiero, nuevamente. No es sólo por la dicha patriótica que siento, sino porque esta noche, cuando dirigía el Coro que cantó “Ay mi patria, bella y perdida” , pensé que si seguimos así vamos a matar la cultura sobre la cual se construyó la historia de Italia.

En tal caso, nuestra patria estaría en verdad “bella y perdida”.

(Aplausos , incluidos de los artistas en escena)

Continuó: Ya que reina acá un clima italiano, yo, Muti, me callé la boca muchos años. Quisiera ahora… tendríamos que darle sentido a este canto; estamos en nuestra casa, el teatro de Roma, y con un coro que cantó magníficamente bien y que acompañó espléndidamente. Si quieren, les propongo unirse a nosotros para que cantemos todos juntos.

Entonces invitó al público a cantar con el  coro de esclavos. “Vi grupos de gente levantarse. Toda la ópera de Roma se levantó. Y el Coro también. Fue un momento mágico en la ópera.
Esa noche no fue solamente una representación de Nabucco, sino también una declaración del teatro de la capital para llamar la atención a los políticos.”

Acá está el video de ese momento lleno de emoción:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/G_gmtO6JnRs

Italy finally woke up. I leave you to savor this. It is moving. 

Last March 12, Silvio Berlusconi had to face reality. Italy celebrated the 150th anniversary of its unification, and this time was at the opera in Rome’s opera “Nabucco” by Giuseppe Verdi, conducted by Maestro Ricardo Muti. Nabucco is a work both musically and politically: it evokes the episode from the bondage of the Jews in Babylon and its famous chorus “Va pensiero” is the song of the oppressed slaves. In Italy, this song is the symbol of the quest for freedom for people, who in the late nineteenth century period when he wrote the opera – was oppressed by the Hapsburg Empire, who fought to the creation of a unified Italy.

Before the performance, Gianni Alemanno, Rome’s mayor, took the stage to deliver a speech denouncing the culture budget cuts made by the government, although Alemanno is a member of the old ruling party and Minister Berlusconi. This political intervention in a cultural moment of the most symbolic for Ialia would produce an unexpected effect, since Berlusconi himself attended the performance.

Then reported by the Times, Ricardo Muti, conductor, said he was a true evening of revolution: “At first there was a standing ovation in the audience. Then we started with opera. It developed very well until we got to the famous song Va pensiero. I immediately felt that the atmosphere was tense in the audience. There are things you can not describe, but you feel them. It was the silence of the public who made her feel. But at the time that people realized that began Va Pensiero, the silence was filled with real fervor. You could feel the visceral reaction of the audience to the cry of the slaves sing, “Oh my country, so beautiful and lost.”

When the choir came to an end because the public could be heard several “bis”. The crowd began shouting: “Viva Italia”, “Viva Verdi”, “Long live Italy!”. People in the house began throwing papers with patriotic messages. Only once Muti had agreed to do an encore for “Va Pensiero” at La Scala in Milan in 1986, since for him the opera does not suffer interruptions. ”I did not just want an encore. Had to be a special intention for it,” he says. But the public had awakened his patriotism. In a theatrical gesture, Muti turned and looked at the audience and Berlusconi at a time, and said:

“Yes, I agree with this.” Long live Italy “. But ….
I have no more than 30 years and have lived my life, but traveled a lot over the world, and today I have shame of what is happening in my country. So I agree to your request for an encore to Va Pensiero, again. It is not just for the joy I feel patriotic, but because tonight, when he directed the choir who sang “Oh my country, beautiful and lost,” and I thought that if we’re going to kill the culture upon which they built the history of Italy .

In this case, our country would truly “beautiful and lost.”

(Applause, including the artists on stage)

He continued: As an Italian climate reigns here, I, Muti, I shut up for many years. I now … would have to make sense of this song, we are in our house, the theater of Rome, and a choir sang magnificently and beautifully accompanied. If you want, I propose to join us to sing together.

Then he invited the audience to sing the chorus of slaves. ”I saw groups of people up. All the Rome Opera House stood. And the choir as well. It was a magical moment in the opera.
That night was not just a representation of Nabucco, but also a statement of the theater in the capital to call attention to the politicians. ”

Here’s the video of that moment full of emotion

http://www.youtube.com/embed/G_gmtO6JnRs

__________ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de virus 6275 (20110707) __________

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com

OPEN LETTER TO EVERY LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT IN CANADA

I am an advocate for Arts and Culture. For 20 years I have warned every level of government not to discriminate financially against youth in arts and culture because it will have dire consequences sooner or later.Every intelligent government in the world – except British Columbia- knows that arts and culture have a calming effect on society. B.C. already has the lowest support for arts and culture in Canada and a few years ago decided to cut the arts even more while authorizing a new roof for yet another sports facility, the cost of which now stands at $ 660 million dollars and rising. I clearly warned that the few dollars they scrape from the arts sector will be minimal compared to the policing and court costs when the predictable “chickens come home to roost”.

Well, unfortunately “the chickens have come home to roost” and the total costs are not only for police, courts and glass, but the damage to tourism and investment that are sure to follow – not to speak of the shame and embarrassment for Vancouver and Canada. When every level of government discriminates against a group or segment of society, it is not discrimination anymore – it is a form of apartheid. Cultural apartheid.

But there is hope. The federal government four years ago instituted a tax credit for children in “fitness”only. After 4 years of protests across Canada, the Canadian government finally corrected this blatant discrimination and offered the same tax credit for children in the arts. When the senior government of Canada, in its wisdom, decides there shall be no more financial discrimination between sports and the arts. there is hope that all levels of government right down to local governments will heed this momentous decision and follow suit.

Sincerely, Sigurd Sabathil, Greater Vancouver, B.C.

 
© 2010 Arts Advocacy BC